Quote of the Day: Aren’t there other “Everyday objects”on a plane?


Why stop at knives Congressman? Aren’t planes full of “everyday objects”?

As I noted last night the TSA has decided to reverse its decision allowing knives under 2.36″ in length onto planes.  Congressman Ed Markey (D-Mass), a vocal critic of the change, unintentionally yet clearly points to the pointlessness of such a prohibition.

“This smart decision by the TSA to delay their knife policy is a victory for the passengers, pilots, flight attendants and law enforcement officers who would have immediately been at risk of a knife attack,” Markey said “People with radical ideas can use everyday objects to cause great harm. If there is an opportunity to decrease risks to Americans, we have a duty to protect our citizens and disallow knives from being taken onto planes.”

As rational people already realize, virtually any object of sufficient hardness or sharpness   can be used as an improvised weapon.  With a little time and effort, many objects that can be purchased on the “secure” side of a TSA checkpoint can be modified into an astonishing array of weapons.

The major reason the 9/11 attacks were “successful” was that with the exception of the flight that crashed in Pennsylvania, the passengers followed the existing script and didn’t resist.  But the flight 93 passengers heroically demonstrated, and as other passengers have demonstrated time and again in dealing with subsequent disturbances, fighting back can overpower terrorists, crazies, drunks, or whomever wants to harm people on an airplane.

While those on flight 93 gave their lives in the effort, proactive steps such as hardening cockpits would make such an outcome remote in the future. In his remarks announcing the relaxation of knife rules, TSA Administrator Pistole:

“(Acknowledged) that such knives could cause injury or even death to individuals in the cabin, Pistole said that, since the advent of reinforced cockpit doors and other precautions following 9/11, small knives did not pose a “catastrophic” threat to the entire aircraft. Striking them from the prohibited items list, Pistole said, would free screeners to focus on catastrophic threats, and would bring U.S. regulations in line with those in Europe.

So in other words, we are less safe as a result of the ban since screeners are wasting time on insignificant threats, rather than focusing on the big ones.  Thanks Congressman Markey.



9 responses to ‘Quote of the Day: Aren’t there other “Everyday objects”on a plane?

    • Good point. Even a cheap, plastic, Bic-pen will stab with authority. Bic used to have a commercial, where they fired a pen through a block of wood.

      • What? You have heard about tactical pens, right?
        Machined, aircraft grade aluminum around a pen.
        $30-$50 gets a pretty good one. Who doesn’t need
        a good pen? The tactical defense part of it is a bonus.
        Why risk your life with a plastic Bic, when $30 gets
        you an aluminum spike? People comment about mine
        all the time. If they say, “Cool.” I’ve probably have
        found a conservative friend and gun owner. If they
        respond with “Really?” I’ve probably got a liberal
        gun grabber. The TSA hasn’t prohibited me from
        flying with it yet. After all, it really is a pen.

    • according to a certain Colorado congressperson, thats an excellent tool to use as a defense for a rape as well. No need for a knife or gun for self defense.

  1. 2.36? I mean, why not 2″ or 2 1/2″? How in Gods name can you measure something after maybe 2.3 or even 2.35? Why that extra 100th of an inch?
    Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *