Plaintiffs in NYC Gravity-Knife Lawsuit appeal Judge’s ruling

Last month, Judge Katherine Forrest ruled in favor of New York City and D.A. Cyrus Vance Jr. which allows the unjust “gravity knife” arrests and prosecutions to continue apace. Her vacuous decision has now been appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. This is the same court which had previously dealt her a unanimous rebuke – reinstating the case which she had initially dismissed.

From Knife Rights:

February 17, 2017: Once again the Plaintiffs in our federal civil rights lawsuit against New York City and District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr., have filed a Notice of Appeal following U.S. District Court Judge Katherine B. Forrest’s tortured 35-page decision in the case.

In the prior appeal of Judge Forrest’s initial outrageous dismissal of the case, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled unanimously in favor of the Plaintiffs. That led to a trial on the merits and the outrageous decision being appealed this time around.

In her decision, Judge Forrest fundamentally re-characterized the case in a way that did not reflect the case presented. The Court disregarded key evidence and ignored the basic argument in the lawsuit that a person has no way of knowing if he possesses a knife that could result in arrest and prosecution. That is the central issue in Plaintiff’s constitutional Void for Vagueness claim. Assistant DA Dan Rather, Jr. even admitted at trial that a knife that cannot be “flicked” open by the purchaser at the time of lawful purchase can suddenly transform into an illegal gravity knife two steps out the door if an NYPD officer is able to “flick” it open.

Despite that damning testimony that proves that the City’s so-called “wrist flick” test is subjective, variable, and thus unconstitutionally vague, as well as all the other evidence presented by the Plaintiffs in the case, the Court avoided dealing with this key point by essentially ignoring Plaintiff’s claim. Instead, the Court bought into the City’s and DA’s egregious argument that the claim that the Plaintiffs could not purchase another knife without risking arrest again was hypothetical, when it is not at all. It is a real risk that the Plaintiffs face, as well as anyone else, in buying or carrying a common folding knife in New York City.

Plaintiffs have commenced their appeal of the adverse decision and briefs in the case will be filed with the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit within several months.

Knife Rights’ Gravity Knife Reform Bill was introduced earlier this week in an effort to solve legislatively the problem of the continuing arrests and prosecutions on bogus Gravity Knife charges in New York City. Governor Cuomo vetoed last year’s bill, which had passed the legislature overwhelmingly, on New Year’s Eve.

comments

  1. Peter says:

    We’ll win the appeal.

Write a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Plaintiffs in NYC Gravity-Knife Lawsuit appeal Judge’s ruling

button to share on facebook
button to tweet
button to share via email